(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4765) J3/12-nnn J3 interpretations letter ballot #26 after meeting 198 - due 12-Oct-2012

[Daniel C Chen]

Hi Stan,

Can I change my vote for F08/0075 (Pointer function reference as variable 
in assignment) and F08/0076 (Pointer function reference in READ) to 'NO' 
please?
After reading Malcolm's 'NO' comments about F08/0075 and F08/0076, I think 
his proposed edit is a better fix. So my modified vote is as follows:

-Y-  ---  F08/0040   MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
-Y-  ---  F08/0074   Implicit type in BLOCK construct
-N-  ---  F08/0075   Pointer function reference as variable in assignment
I agree with Malcolm.

-N-  ---  F08/0076   Pointer function reference in READ
I agree with Malcolm.

-Y-  ---  F08/0077   Function references as variables in DATA statements
-Y-  ---  F08/0078   Are the IEEE values +0 and -0 distinguished
-C-  ---  F08/0079   NAMELIST and type specification
There are typos in the example as Bill indicated. My vote should be 
changed to 'YES' after the typos are fixed.

-Y-  ---  F08/0080   Array constructors with polymorphic values
-Y-  ---  F08/0081   Deallocation error handling
-Y-  ---  F08/0082   Generic identifier and dtv arguments


Thanks,

Daniel

XL Fortran Development - IBM Toronto Software Lab
Phone: 905-413-3056 
Tie: 969-3056 
Email: cdchen at ca.ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/fortran/xlfortran



From:   "Whitlock, Stan" <stan.whitlock at intel.com>
To:     x3j3 <j3 at j3-fortran.org>
Cc:     "Whitlock, Stan" <stan.whitlock at intel.com>
Date:   10/09/2012 08:52 PM
Subject:        Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4765) J3/12-nnn J3 interpretations 
letter ballot #26 after meeting 198 - due 12-Oct-2012
Sent by:        j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org



My vote on J3 interp letter ballot #26 is below.  Thanks
 
/Stan Whitlock
Intel Corp
 
 
To:        J3 Members
Subject:   J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #26 - due 12-Oct-2012
Date: 12-Sep-2012
 
 
10 Fortran interpretations are currently "Passed by J3 meeting" after
J3 meeting #198.  This is the letter ballot phase to go from "Passed
by J3 meeting" to "Passed by J3 letter ballot".
 
The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
 
Yes  No   Number     Title
 
-Y-  ---  F08/0040   MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
-Y-  ---  F08/0074   Implicit type in BLOCK construct
-Y-  ---  F08/0075   Pointer function reference as variable in assignment
-Y-  ---  F08/0076   Pointer function reference in READ
-Y-  ---  F08/0077   Function references as variables in DATA statements
-Y-  ---  F08/0078   Are the IEEE values +0 and -0 distinguished
-Y-  ---  F08/0079   NAMELIST and type specification
-Y-  ---  F08/0080   Array constructors with polymorphic values
-Y-  ---  F08/0081   Deallocation error handling
-Y-  ---  F08/0082   Generic identifier and dtv arguments
 
Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send only the
above text {not this entire mail message} with any comments to
 
        j3 at j3-fortran.org
 
by 11:59:59PM, PDT, Friday, 12-Oct-2012, in order to be counted.
_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20121012/cd81c7cb/attachment-0001.html