(j3.2006) [J3-interp] Result of the interpretations ballot 4

[Whitlock, Stan]

John - yes, all 2 of us in /interp agree with Malcolm's proposal.  Thanks			/Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of John Reid
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:34 AM
To: fortran standards email list for J3
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) [J3-interp] Result of the interpretations ballot 4

Stan,

I am not a member of \interp (though I have asked to join) so I have not seen this message from Malcolm. Can I assume that the whole of \interp agrees?

John.

Whitlock, Stan wrote:
> John - I agree with Malcolm - the "?"s should become "C"s.  Thanks				/Stan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: j3-interp-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org 
> [mailto:j3-interp-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Malcolm 
> Cohen
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:09 PM
> To: j3-interp at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> Subject: Re: [J3-interp] Result of the interpretations ballot 4
>
> Hi John,
>
>> There remains the task of choosing the result of all the ? items. I 
>> propose that they all be C, so that J3 decides what to do about them 
>> at its meeting next week. Is this OK with you?
>
> Yes, that seems appropriate to me.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
> _______________________________________________
> J3-interp mailing list
> J3-interp at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3-interp
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>

_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3