(j3.2006) READ unit ambiguity

[Robert Corbett]

On 3/5/2012 8:43 AM, Bill Long wrote:
>
>
> On 3/5/12 2:27 AM, Robert Corbett wrote:
>> I found another case this past weekend.
>>
>>
>> DO 10 .OP. P = 1, 10
>>
>
> This looks nonconforming.  The syntax rule says
>
> <do-variable> is <scalar-int-variable-name>
>
> and 10.OP.P does not qualify as a "name".

You are correct.  I remembered that a /do-variable/ had to be
a /name/ when I woke up this morning.

The only other ambiguity I found is another instance of the
problem with labels.  It is

        10 .OP. P % C => Q

We might want to add a constraint on the form of a
/data-stmt-object/.

Bob Corbett