(j3.2006) READ unit ambiguity

[Van Snyder]

Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>> In a new post, Ian Harvey
>>     
>
> Who is this guy?  I hope you've invited him to join the committee!
>
>   
>> points out that Note 3.7 is
>> no longer true.  We can now have
>>
>>       10 .op. p = x
>>
>> where 10 can be a label or a left operand.
>>     
>
> Now this one is very easily fixed - just delete free-form source and the problem 
> goes away.
>   

I obviously wasn't thinking of this case, but I did suggest, sometime 
prior to 1986, that both statement labels and construct labels ought to 
be followed by a colon in free form.

> Cheers,
>