(j3.2006) Partial write in record with nonadvancing I/O

[Van Snyder]

Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>
>> That's certainly true, but not a valid excuse for avoiding improvement
>> in exposition.
>>     
>
> I am yet to read any suggestion that would be an improvement.  Inserting loads 
> of irrelevant guff about hardware that was obsolete back in F77 days would be
> (a) completely outside the scope of the standard;
> (b) a significant disimprovement;
> (c) a total waste of time.
>   

There were no specific proposed edits in my mail message.

> Cheers,
>