(j3.2006) Partial write in record with nonadvancing I/O
Thu Mar 1 02:37:30 EST 2012
Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>> That's certainly true, but not a valid excuse for avoiding improvement
>> in exposition.
> I am yet to read any suggestion that would be an improvement. Inserting loads
> of irrelevant guff about hardware that was obsolete back in F77 days would be
> (a) completely outside the scope of the standard;
> (b) a significant disimprovement;
> (c) a total waste of time.
There were no specific proposed edits in my mail message.
More information about the J3