(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4617) RE: Corrigendum 1

[Whitlock, Stan]

John and DavidM,

I have gone through David's N1901 to correct the edits on the interps that go with the edits in Corrigendum 1.  Everything makes sense - it looks good.  I briefly went through N1902 and N10903 and didn't see anything obvious missing.  I hope to have a new 12-006Ar2 for m197.

John did a great job on getting the ballots reflected completely in the corrigendum and David did a great job producing various drafts until we now have Corrigendum 1 for F2008.  I'll work from N1902 since I like line numbers.

Thanks					/Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of John Reid
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:33 PM
To: WG5
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4614) Corrigendum 1

WG5,

On 22 December, I said

 > The draft result is attached. Please let me know ASAP if I have missed  > your ballot or made any other mistake.
 >
 > No-one voted NO and only two voted YES with comments, so the ballot  > passes, subject to the comments being addressed.
 >
 > The comments have been discussed by email by Malcolm Cohen, Robert  > Corbett, David Muxworthy, and Bill Long. The revised version is N1901.
 > This has annotations showing what changes have been made. Please let  > me know by 1 Jan if you have any comments on this. David will then  > produce a final WG5 draft without the annotations and prepare the  > version to send to SC22.

N1901 was sent to you by David on the same day. No-one has commented, so I regard N1901 as defining the corrigendum. The annotations in yellow in
N1901 show the proposed changes from N1893 arising from discussions between those who made comments in the ballot.

David has now prepared a new version, N1902, without these annotations and with some changes to the comments in italics (which are for WG5 only). He has made one editorial change to the actual text, which is with respect to spaces in the edits for clause 13.5, as requested by Malcolm.

David has also prepared the text for the actual corrigendum, N1903. This is the same as N1902, except that the comments in italics have been removed.

I have changed N1896 slightly from the version (N1896-1) that I sent on
22 December. I have added the late comments that came from Malcolm and I now show how each comment was addressed.

I attach N1896, N1902, and N1903. I think N1903 is ready to send to SC22. However, I will wait until next Monday in case anyone sees any problems.

Best wishes,

John.