(j3.2006) Partial write in record with nonadvancing I/O

Bill Long longb
Tue Feb 28 08:20:46 EST 2012



On 2/27/12 6:58 PM, Robert Corbett wrote:
> On 02/27/12 01:19, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> at comp.lang.fortran, Bob Corbett queried what the different compilers
>> output
>> for the following program - and the replies showed that the results
>> vary a lot. Cf.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/694050b1806da367
>>
>>
>> (I assume that he intended to post it here or write an IR.)
>>
> No, I did not intend to post the program to this mailing
> list. I did not intend to write an interpretation request.
> The answers to interpretation requests 000024 and 000027
> against the Fortran 95 standard answered any questions I
> might have had about what the output of the program should
> be.
>
> I have known for about a decade that the implementation I
> help support does not implement nonadvancing i/o as
> required by interpretations 000024 and 000027. I recently
> started working on fixes for our implementation. After
> about a day, I realized that the fixes would require much
> more work than I had originally thought. I was curious how
> other implementations handled some of the hard cases, which
> resulted in my posting on comp.lang.fortran.

Which at least some of us would have never seen since we quit reading 
comp.lang.fortran years ago when the signal/noise ratio dropped too far.

Cheers,
Bill


>
> Bob Corbett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101





More information about the J3 mailing list