(j3.2006) Do we need an interp for this?

[Malcolm Cohen]

>There is no specification of the relationship of an associate name to
>the intent specification of the selector, if the selector happens to be
>a dummy argument.

Yes and no.  An associating entity does not have any INTENT attribute, but how 
it may be used is affected by INTENT(IN).

>Do we need an interp for this,

I do not see why.

> or can we just fix it in the next
>revision?  Maybe put it in section E of the 008?

There is nothing to fix.

8.1.3.3p2 means that the associate-name for an INTENT(IN) selector is not 
permitted to appear in a variable definition context.  This covers not just 
INTENT(IN) but also selectors that are not variables.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.