(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4541) Vote on second WG5 ballot on interpretations

David Muxworthy d.muxworthy
Tue Sep 27 13:05:14 EDT 2011


Herewith my vote.
David Muxworthy
-----------------------------------
Yes  No Number     Title
-Y- --- F08/0021   STORAGE_SIZE and unlimited polymorphic
-Y- --- F08/0022   DO CONCURRENT and file i/o
-Y- --- F08/0023   DO CONCURRENT and POINTER
-Y- --- F08/0024   Dummy arguments of impure elemental procedures
-Y- --- F08/0025   DO CONCURRENT and ALLOCATABLE
-Y- --- F08/0026   DO CONCURRENT and output interleaving
-Y- --- F08/0027   ATOMIC_REF example
-Y- --- F08/0028   Does a procedure reference cause loop termination?
-Y- --- F08/0029   G0 edit descriptor and floating-point output
-Y- --- F08/0030   Unlimited format repeat effects
-Y- --- F08/0031   PURE INTENT(OUT) finalization
-Y- --- F08/0032   PURE FUNCTION result finalization
-Y- --- F08/0033   PURE polymorphic finalization
-Y- --- F08/0034   ELEMENTAL INTENT(OUT) finalization
-Y- --- F08/0035   Maximum value for SHIFT argument to SHIFTL
                    and SHIFTR
-C- --- F08/0036   NORM2 example in Annex C
-Y- --- F08/0037   PROCEDURE POINTER vs PROTECTED
-C- --- F08/0038   Are pointless restrictions on DIM arguments
                    intended?
-Y- --- F08/0039   Many-one vector subscript usage
-Y- --- F08/0040   MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
-Y- --- F08/0042   SOURCE= questions
-Y- --- F08/0043   Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed
                    object
-Y- --- F08/0044   Resolving the type of a coarray or coindexed object
-C- --- F08/0046   VALUE attribute restrictions
-Y- --- F08/0047   public generic with same name as private type
-Y- --- F08/0049   ELEMENTAL functions with nonconstant type parameters
-Y- --- F08/0050   Ordering requirements on definition of specification
                    functions
-Y- --- F08/0051   Pure procedure arguments with VALUE
-y- --- F08/0052   Private type-bound procedures
-C- --- F08/0053   Restrictions on generic declarations, generic
                    resolution
-Y- --- F08/0054   Requirements for needing an explicit interface
--------------------------
F08/0036
The edit draws attention to the definition of NORM2.  This contains a
recommendation on computation, at [375:4], which is the only
'recommendation' in subclause 13.  Should it not be a Note, or be
omitted altogether?
--------------------------
F08/0038
Yes to the principle.  I have not checked the edits pending the outcome
of F08/0003.
--------------------------
F08/0046
The edit should be to page xv.
--------------------------
F08/0053
In the edit, the reference to (9.6.4.8.3) should immediately follow
"arguments".
--------------------------




More information about the J3 mailing list