(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4541) Vote on second WG5 ballot on interpretations
David Muxworthy
d.muxworthy
Tue Sep 27 13:05:14 EDT 2011
Herewith my vote.
David Muxworthy
-----------------------------------
Yes No Number Title
-Y- --- F08/0021 STORAGE_SIZE and unlimited polymorphic
-Y- --- F08/0022 DO CONCURRENT and file i/o
-Y- --- F08/0023 DO CONCURRENT and POINTER
-Y- --- F08/0024 Dummy arguments of impure elemental procedures
-Y- --- F08/0025 DO CONCURRENT and ALLOCATABLE
-Y- --- F08/0026 DO CONCURRENT and output interleaving
-Y- --- F08/0027 ATOMIC_REF example
-Y- --- F08/0028 Does a procedure reference cause loop termination?
-Y- --- F08/0029 G0 edit descriptor and floating-point output
-Y- --- F08/0030 Unlimited format repeat effects
-Y- --- F08/0031 PURE INTENT(OUT) finalization
-Y- --- F08/0032 PURE FUNCTION result finalization
-Y- --- F08/0033 PURE polymorphic finalization
-Y- --- F08/0034 ELEMENTAL INTENT(OUT) finalization
-Y- --- F08/0035 Maximum value for SHIFT argument to SHIFTL
and SHIFTR
-C- --- F08/0036 NORM2 example in Annex C
-Y- --- F08/0037 PROCEDURE POINTER vs PROTECTED
-C- --- F08/0038 Are pointless restrictions on DIM arguments
intended?
-Y- --- F08/0039 Many-one vector subscript usage
-Y- --- F08/0040 MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
-Y- --- F08/0042 SOURCE= questions
-Y- --- F08/0043 Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed
object
-Y- --- F08/0044 Resolving the type of a coarray or coindexed object
-C- --- F08/0046 VALUE attribute restrictions
-Y- --- F08/0047 public generic with same name as private type
-Y- --- F08/0049 ELEMENTAL functions with nonconstant type parameters
-Y- --- F08/0050 Ordering requirements on definition of specification
functions
-Y- --- F08/0051 Pure procedure arguments with VALUE
-y- --- F08/0052 Private type-bound procedures
-C- --- F08/0053 Restrictions on generic declarations, generic
resolution
-Y- --- F08/0054 Requirements for needing an explicit interface
--------------------------
F08/0036
The edit draws attention to the definition of NORM2. This contains a
recommendation on computation, at [375:4], which is the only
'recommendation' in subclause 13. Should it not be a Note, or be
omitted altogether?
--------------------------
F08/0038
Yes to the principle. I have not checked the edits pending the outcome
of F08/0003.
--------------------------
F08/0046
The edit should be to page xv.
--------------------------
F08/0053
In the edit, the reference to (9.6.4.8.3) should immediately follow
"arguments".
--------------------------
More information about the J3
mailing list