(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4537) Provisional result of WG5 interps ballot 1.

John Reid John.Reid
Fri Sep 23 03:54:07 EDT 2011

Van Snyder wrote:
> I withdrew my objection to F08/0010 yesterday.

Sorry to have overlooked this. I have changed your vote and that of 
Malcolm to YES.


> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 09:15 -0700, John Reid wrote:
>> F08/0010
>> Cohen comment
>> Van's assertion that the "argument" parts of the edits is covered by
>> is mistaken - does not cover the case of
>> a subobject of an allocatable being argument associated, and (3) does
>> not cover the case when the object has the TARGET attribute (that is
>> explicitly excluded). Deleting those parts would change my vote to NO.
>> (There is some scope for wordsmithing to avoid precisely the cases
>> that can be proven by theorem to be covered by various existing bits
>> of, but in my view this would make the edits more
>> complicated to no good purpose, so I would probably still want to vote
>> NO if such changes were made.)
>> Snyder NO vote
>> The "argument" parts of the edits are not necessary; they are covered
>> by and (3).  We should have imposed a similar
>> requirement for construct association, but did not, so the remainder
>> of the edits are germane.
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: N1878-2.txt
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20110923/7fb0c889/attachment-0001.txt>

More information about the J3 mailing list