(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4533) Interpretation ballot N1875/1876
Van Snyder
Van.Snyder
Wed Sep 21 21:38:33 EDT 2011
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:09 -0700, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> F08/0010 COMMENT:
> Van's assertion that the "argument" parts of the edits is covered by
> 12.5.2.13p1(1) is mistaken - 12.5.2.13p1(1) does not cover the case of
> a subobject of an allocatable being argument associated...
I see what Malcolm is getting at. 12.5.2.13 addresses what one can do
or not do to the allocation status of a subobject of an entity
associated with a dummy argument, not what one can do or not do to the
allocation status of an object whose subobject is associated with a
dummy argument.
I no longer object to F08/0010.
More information about the J3
mailing list