(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4572) [ukfortran] Second WG5 ballot oninterpretations
Wed Oct 19 02:35:05 EDT 2011
>I do not agree that the restrictions on DIM arguments are
>pointless. While they are not necessary to permit conforming
>implementations, they simplify code generation and allow more
>efficient code to be generated in some cases.
No they don't. Appearance of a previously-prohibited optional dummy with this
interp has precisely the same meaning as it appearing parenthesised would, i.e.
there is no passing-on of the optionality.
Since there is no passing-on of the optionality (an absent one is not
permitted), you will need a concrete counter-example to demonstrate different
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
More information about the J3