Van Snyder wrote: > 7. [5.2.1p1 9:9] It is not clear what base types CFI_attribute_t, > CFI_index_t, CFI_rank_t and CFI_type_t have. They are simply described > as "typedef". "typedef" for what? Integers, I suspect. The base type > should be specified. This is specified in 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 when the types are used. John.