(j3.2006) FW: 11-229 J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #24 - due 19-Aug-2011 - 2nd try

[Whitlock, Stan]

This time I'll include 11-229.  Sorry                                              /Stan
________________________________
From: Whitlock, Stan
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:18 AM
To: x3j3
Cc: Whitlock, Stan
Subject: 11-229 J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #24 - due 19-Aug-2011

                                                          11-229

To:        J3 Members
From:      Stan Whitlock
Subject:   J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #24 - due 19-Aug-2011
Date: 2011 July 18


Enclosed in the next letter ballot on Fortran interpretations.

The rules by which we operate say:

    o   J3 votes on the answer at a J3 meeting; a simple majority
        vote marks the answer as "passed by J3 meeting".

    o   Between J3 meetings the chair of /interp sends a J3 letter
        ballot to J3 to approve interp answers that have been "passed
        by J3 meeting".  The letter ballot runs for 30 days.  Not
        voting on three of four consecutive J3 letter ballots is
        grounds to terminate J3 membership.  An interp answer passes
        by a 2/3rds vote;  a no vote must be accompanied by an
        explanation of the changes necessary to change the member's
        vote to yes.

        J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for
        more study even if the answer passes.

20 Fortran interpretations are currently "Passed by J3 meeting" after
J3 meeting #195.  This is the letter ballot phase to go from "Passed
by J3 meeting" to "Passed by J3 letter ballot".

The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No   Number     Title

---  ---  F03/0017   Dummy procedure pointers and PRESENT
---  ---  F03/0018   Multiple identical specific procedures in
                      type-bound generic
---  ---  F03/0019   Multiple identical specific procedures in
                      generic interface blocks
---  ---  F03/0021   What kind of token is a stop code?
---  ---  F03/0046   Unlimited polymorphic pointers in common blocks
---  ---  F03/0053   The BIND attribute for C_PTR and C_FUNPTR
---  ---  F03/0065   Relational equivalence
---  ---  F03/0084   IEEE_SET_ROUNDING_MODE in a subroutine
---  ---  F03/0103   Restrictions on dummy arguments not present for
                      polymorphic type or parameterized derived type
---  ---  F03/0116   indistinguishable specifics for a generic
                      interface with use association
---  ---  F03/0118   Are lower bounds of assumed-shape arrays assumed?
---  ---  F03/0120   When are parameterized sequence types the same type?
---  ---  F08/0055   G editing for reals
---  ---  F08/0056   Non-polymorphic ALLOCATE with polymorphic SOURCE=
---  ---  F08/0057   Interoperability with empty types
---  ---  F08/0058   ENTRY point RESULT variable
---  ---  F08/0059   Auto-targetting requirements
---  ---  F08/0060   Procedure pointer assignment with an EXTERNAL target
---  ---  F08/0061   Description of the CONTIGUOUS attribute misworded?
---  ---  F08/0062   Mixing default initialization with DATA
                      initialization

The text of these interpretations is attached.  Each interpretation
starts with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send only the
above text {not this entire mail message} with any comments to

        j3 at j3-fortran.org

by 11:59:59PM, PDT, Friday, 19-Aug-2011, in order to be counted.


Thanks                         /Stan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20110719/f7b030eb/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 11-229 interp letter ballot #24 - due 19-Aug-2011.txt
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20110719/f7b030eb/attachment-0001.txt>