(j3.2006) J3 interp letter ballot #23 due 25-Mar-2011

Van Snyder Van.Snyder
Tue Feb 22 18:45:57 EST 2011




> Yes  No   Number     Title



> -C-  ---  F03/0124   Definition is poorly defined


I agree with Tobias Burnus that the types need to be sequence types, and
COMMON should be spelled correctly. 
Since this is an F03 interpretation being applied to F08, the edits
should be explicitly stated to refer to 10-007r1 (the page and line
numbers remain unchanged from 10-007).


> -C-  ---  F08/0050   Ordering requirements on definition of
>                             specification functions


The quotations in the "background" section from F08/7.1.12 and
F08/7.1.11 need paragraph and page numbers.  The one from 7.1.12 is
7.1.12p2, and the one from 7.1.11 is paragraphs 8 and 9.  The page:line
for the first one is correct, but for the second the page number is
lacking.  It is page 151 in both 10-007 and 10-007r1.
The edits should be stated to refer to 10-007r1 (the page and line
numbers remain unchanged from 10-007).


> -C-  ---  F08/0051   Pure procedure arguments with VALUE


The edit should be stated to refer to 10-007r1 (the page and line number
remains unchanged from 10-007).  Should the defect type be
"clarification" instead of "erratum?"


> -C-  ---  F08/0052   Private type-bound procedures


The reference for the quotation in the answer section should be
4.5.7.3p1, not just 4.5.7.3 (it's complete in the edit).
The page:line number should be stated to refer to 10-007r1 (it remains
unchanged from 10-007).


> -C-  ---  F08/0053   Restrictions on generic declarations, generic
>                             resolution


The background section refers to 12.4.3.4 on page 283 for the
description of the characteristics that cause dummy arguments to be
distinguishable.  More precisely, the description is in 12.4.3.4.5p3 at
[10-007r1:286:1-5], not page 283.  C1214 is more precisely at
[10-007r1:286:12-13].
The page:line numbers should be stated to refer to 10-007r1.


> -C-  ---  F08/0054   Requirements for needing an explicit interface


The reference in the question part could more precisely be 12.4.2.2p1.
it would be helpful to add [10-007r1:279:19-35].

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20110222/20fe352c/attachment.htm>



More information about the J3 mailing list