(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4602) Corrigendum 1
Bill Long
longb
Mon Dec 12 18:28:08 EST 2011
On 11/15/11 4:22 AM, John Reid wrote:
Please answer the following question "Is N1893, with the references and
notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 1 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.
1) Yes.
2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
3) No, for the following reasons.
4) Abstain.
This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5 at open-std.org
to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on December 13, 2011.
2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
Comment 1: This is not a comment on David's work, but rather an
observation of something that might have been overlooked. In the edits
for [76:10-] para 9 of 4.5.6.3 is moved to the beginning of the
subclause. But the Note 4.49, which naturally refers to that paragraph
did not get moved. Should it have been moved as well, or put at the end
of the subclause as is often done with notes? The Note now seems out of
place.
Comment 2: Edit citation [246:15] should have been [246:15+].
Note that neither of these comments needs to be addressed for the
Corrigendum to pass. The first concerns the placement of a Note that
can easily be addressed in the next revision. The second relates to
text that will be deleted before sending to ISO. These are for
consideration mainly if other comments require changes.
Cheers,
Bill
--
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
More information about the J3
mailing list