(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4512) Changes to N1866 to create N1869 (PDTR)

[Toon Moene]

On 08/18/2011 09:21 PM, I wrote:

> On 08/18/2011 09:03 PM, Bill Long wrote:
>
>> On 8/18/11 1:52 PM, I wrote:

[ On the Interoperability PDTR ]

>>> Without opposition (from you) NEN will vote "abstain" ... etc.
>>>
>>> Hmmm, do we have a conflict of schedule here ?
>>
>> I don't think so. There is currently an ISO Ballot running for the PDTR.
>> It appears that the NEN vote on that ballot is "abstain".
>
> Well, it probably will, if I do not advise otherwise. However, I would
> like to advise the "Programming Languages" group to vote "Yes" (I am the
> only one on that committee knowledgable about Fortran).

I whined too early.  Today I got the agenda for the September 2 meeting 
of the Dutch NEN "Programming Languages" Committee and this, along with 
4 other items, is listed for voting.

Kind regards - and thanks for your patience ;-)

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news