(j3.2006) Need an interp for this?

[Robert Corbett]

On 08/18/11 22:48, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>> Change allocate to deallocate, and assume d%l2p is allocated.  Then 
>> what happens to the associate name?
>
> Program is not conforming, but perhaps only because the standard 
> doesn't establish an interpretation for it.  16.5.1.6p5 cannot be 
> satisfied if the selector disappears in some way.
We banned the deallocation in F08/0010.

Bob Corbett