(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4512) Changes to N1866 to create N1869 (PDTR)

[Toon Moene]

On 08/18/2011 09:03 PM, Bill Long wrote:

> On 8/18/11 1:52 PM, Toon Moene wrote:

>> Without opposition (from you) NEN will vote "abstain" ... etc.
>>
>> Hmmm, do we have a conflict of schedule here ?
>
> I don't think so. There is currently an ISO Ballot running for the PDTR.
> It appears that the NEN vote on that ballot is "abstain".

Well, it probably will, if I do not advise otherwise.  However, I would 
like to advise the "Programming Languages" group to vote "Yes" (I am the 
only one on that committee knowledgable about Fortran).

> The October meeting will discuss the comments received as part of the
> PDTR ballot. The goal is to create a repaired TR that will become the
> DTR. I would anticipate a quick WG5 informal ballot on the output of the
> meeting to give people a last chance at comments, and then polish up a
> final version that goes out for the DTR vote.

OK - unfortunately, I do not have the time to attend the October meeting.

Kind regards - and thanks for the explanation,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news