(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4512) Changes to N1866 to create N1869 (PDTR)

[Toon Moene]

On 08/09/2011 07:54 PM, Bill Long wrote:

> At this point, the action should be for the US tag to decide on a
> convention and make a comment to that effect in our Ballot. The ballot
> comments will be considered at the October J3 meeting.

Hmmm, today *18/8/2011) I got an e-mail from the Dutch "NEN" (norms 
institute):

Beste commissieleden,

Op 20 september 2011 moet NEN haar positie kenbaar maken ten aanzien van 
onderstaand document:

    On the 20th of September 2011 NEN has to vote on:

N 4633 ISO/IEC PDTR 29113, Information technology - Further 
Interoperability of Fortran with C

Zonder bezwaar uwerzijds zal NEN 'abstain' stemmen. Indien u een andere 
mening heeft, verzoek ik u vriendelijk dit voor 13 september 2011 
kenbaar te maken aan Linda.Pardoen at nen.nl.

    Without opposition (from you) NEN will vote "abstain" ... etc.

Hmmm, do we have a conflict of schedule here ?

Kind regards,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news