(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4512) Changes to N1866 to create N1869 (PDTR)

[Bill Long]

At this point, the action should be for the US tag to decide on a 
convention and make a comment to that effect in our Ballot.  The ballot 
comments will be considered at the October J3 meeting.

Cheers,
Bill


On 8/9/11 12:48 PM, Van Snyder wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 09:31 -0700, john.reid at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>> WG5,
>>
>> Here is Bill Long's explanation of the changes to N1866 that he made to create N1869.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> John.
>
> Bill left the following up to committee action.  I don't know what that
> means at this time:
>
> [20:17, 21, 25] Replace "be" by "not be less than" or "be greater than
> or equal to". {It seems simpler in this context to require that the
> lower and upper bounds arrays have the right size. I agree with the
> point that this is not consistent with CFI_allocate and CFI_address,
> but an equally compelling argument could be made for changing those
> instead. Need committee input on this issue.}
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101