(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4432) [ukfortran] Processing the TR ballot

[malcolm at nag-j.co.jp]

Bill Long wrote:
> My preference would be to create an updated draft based on the edits for 
> categories 1-5, have a subgroup review the result as a PDTR candidate, and leave 
> the comparatively small number of issues in category 6 for responses to the PDTR 
> ballot and resolution at the June meeting."

John Reid wrote:
> I want us to do this.
...
> If you strongly object to this plan, please let me know at once.

I object.

We should not forward any draft as a PDTR without a positive WG5 vote.
That has not yet been achieved.

Cheers,
-- 
.....................Malcolm.