(j3.2006) is sequence association allowed for coarray dummy
Fri Oct 1 11:13:24 EDT 2010
Thanks John and Bill for making an interp paper. I haven't got a chance
to do it myself.
XL Fortran Compiler Test
IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, On, L6G 1C7
Phone (905) 413-3444 Tie-line 313-3444
email: jimxia at ca.ibm.com
Bill Long <longb at cray.com>
"John.Reid at stfc.ac.uk" <John.Reid at stfc.ac.uk>, fortran standards email
list for J3 <j3 at j3-fortran.org>
10/01/2010 11:09 AM
Re: (j3.2006) is sequence association allowed for coarray dummy
Somewhere you need a line
so that the cited subclause and page numbers have a context for a future
Also, I would enhance the answer with more explanation:
"No. This restriction contradicts 188.8.131.52 para 13 [294:28-31] which
does allow the example program. Edits are supplied to remove the
John Reid wrote:
> Jim Xia wrote:
>> The standard says this
>> So does it mean sequence association is not allowed for coarray case.
>> Consider the following case
>> subroutine sub (x)
>> real x(10)[*]
>> end subroutine
>> end interface
>> real, save :: x(100)[*]
>> call sub (x(10)) !<--x(10) is not simply contiguous
>> Is this intended to be disallowed, or is this an oversight?
> Here is a draft interp.
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
J3 mailing list
J3 at j3-fortran.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the J3