(j3.2006) a question on interp F08/0049
Mon Nov 15 11:00:23 EST 2010
> > Don't confuse this with the COELEMENTAL attribute! Of course
> > coelemental functions cannot have variable type parameters at this
> If Malcolm meant this as a joke he got me...I instantly went to search
> the pdf to see if you guys added this while I was sleeping. Was there a
> proposal for it or some such?
All the proposed collectives are transformational subroutines, and
COELEMENTAL attribute has never been proposed. What he meant was
elemental routines should not be considered as if there were a requirement
that all images should be evaluated identically in terms of routine
characteristics. Although I can't think of a case where this can be a
problem for now, the original wording in F08 seems to prevent this on
purpose. I'd not be surprised to see a further interp trying to reverse
this interp answer again.
XL Fortran Compiler Test
IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, On, L6G 1C7
Phone (905) 413-3444 Tie-line 313-3444
email: jimxia at ca.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the J3