(j3.2006) reduction routine
Rasmussen, Craig
crasmussen
Tue May 25 15:25:26 EDT 2010
Interesting that this question would come up now. I've just started to use
Haskell for some compiler stuff and functional languages can really do this
and similar things, like function composition, nicely.
-craig
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Bill Long <longb at cray.com> wrote:
>
>
> Van Snyder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 18:01 -0700, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>>
>>> I certainly hope we're talking about an intrinsic reduction, or what
>>> is the point of this discussion?
>>>
>>
>> Bill wanted to pass a specific that is automatically resolved from a
>> generic operator(.myplus.). That doesn't sound like an intrinsic
>> reduction.
>>
>>
> Perhaps confusing wording. I was thinking of an intrinsic procedure,
> hypothetically named 'reduction'. Not intrinsic operators.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at j3-fortran.org
>> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>>
>
> --
> Bill Long longb at cray.com
> Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
> Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
> Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20100525/f60c2b39/attachment.htm>
More information about the J3
mailing list