(j3.2006) question about generic resolution

[Bill Long]

Bill Long wrote:
> 
> Malcolm Cohen wrote:
>> Bill Long wrote:
>>
>>> or as an interp later.
>> There is no doubt that this is what we ought to do.
> 
> OK. I've written an interp paper for this and will upload it as soon as 
> Dan switches the web site over to Meeting 192.

Paper is 10-145.

Cheers,
Bill



> 
>> Aleks Donev wrote:
>>> 4) Modify the rules so that one cannot write a generic like this. For example, 
>>> do not allow "pointer, INTENT(IN)" (caps serve an emphasis purpose here) and 
>>> "allocatable" to be used for disambiguation.
>> Now that *is* an improvement.  Still a bit icky, but that's not unusual for us.
>>
> 
> In the interp, I listed multiple alternative solutions, but proposed 
> this one as the resolution of the problem, and included the edit to 
> implement this one. /Interp will modify it as they see fit.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101