(j3.2006) question about generic resolution

[Van Snyder]

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 22:35 -0700, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> Van Snyder wrote:
> > It seems to me that we can add "nonallocatable" before "target" in
> > 12.5.2.7p2 and make the reference unambiguous.
> This is not a good way to resolve this, IMO. Don't throw the baby out 
> with the bath water---allocatable targets are just fine so long as 
> generics are not involved. We should focus on fixing the generic 
> resolution conflict, not removing, crippling, or otherwise lessening 
> (either one of) the features.

It's one more possibility to add to Bill's list.

> Best,
> Aleks
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3