(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4277) Systematic reviews of Part 3 and the TR on enhanced modules
Bill Long
longb
Mon Jun 28 14:24:23 EDT 2010
John Reid wrote:
> WG5,
>
> Here are the results of the two systematic reviews that have just completed.
> They have both been confirmed (7-2-23 for Part 3 and 9-1-22 for the TR). The
> surprise for me was re Part 3, but keeping it a bit longer seems harmless.
>
Confirming the submodule TR just in time for it to become irrelevant.
Is there any mechanism for including a statement of support by the WG or
development body for a particular position when this voting occurs? I
suspect many of the 'confirm' votes were inertial. If the argument had
been made that the facility is included in the Fortran 2008 standard,
and that a separate description of the facility was, at best, a
distraction, the vote might have been different.
> Two of the files are rtf, which I do not normally put on the web site, but I can
> read them easily under Linux with Open Office. Is anyone unhappy with putting
> these two up?
>
Added OS: The TextEdit application that comes with the Mac OS can
display the .rtf files. The content of the files is certainly
interesting, so I vote to put them up.
Cheers,
Bill
> Best wishes,
>
> John.
>
>
>
--
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
More information about the J3
mailing list