(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4277) Systematic reviews of Part 3 and the TR on enhanced modules

Bill Long longb
Mon Jun 28 14:24:23 EDT 2010



John Reid wrote:
> WG5,
> 
> Here are the results of the two systematic reviews that have just completed. 
> They have both been confirmed (7-2-23 for Part 3 and 9-1-22 for the TR). The 
> surprise for me was re Part 3, but keeping it a bit longer seems harmless.
> 

Confirming the submodule TR just in time for it to become irrelevant.

Is there any mechanism for including a statement of support by the WG or 
development body for a particular position when this voting occurs?  I 
suspect many of the 'confirm' votes were inertial.  If the argument had 
been made that the facility is included in the Fortran 2008 standard, 
and that a separate description of the facility was, at best, a 
distraction, the vote might have been different.


> Two of the files are rtf, which I do not normally put on the web site, but I can 
> read them easily under Linux with Open Office. Is anyone unhappy with putting 
> these two up?
> 

Added OS:  The TextEdit application that comes with the Mac OS can 
display the .rtf files.  The content of the files is certainly 
interesting, so I vote to put them up.

Cheers,
Bill



> Best wishes,
> 
> John.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Bill Long                                           longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &                 voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development            fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101





More information about the J3 mailing list