(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4393) [ukfortran] Result of informal ballot on draft TR
Wed Dec 8 09:00:27 EST 2010
On 12/07/10 15:43, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
> The main one is 10-235r1, which I do NOT feel has been properly
> considered, and is as problematic as the TYPE(*) issue and even more
> pervasive. Unfortunately, explaining why (beyond what is in 10-235r1,
> which clearly wasn't adequate) is non-trivial.
I do not find an r1 of this paper on the J3 server?
I took a quick look at 235. It has some good points, but I must say that
any paper that begins with "we need to start from scratch", i.e., undo
everything else others have done, and implement your favorite approach,
does not get sympathy from me regardless of technical content (which has
some good points but also a lot of exaggerations). There are things I
would like to change in the proposal, from scratch (e.g., separate
type/kind from the rank descriptors). I have not put them down as
comments because we voted many times, straw votes, took opinions from
people, tried to arrive at a consensus. A committee cannot function with
everyone just drumming their own drum, every meeting, to the same tune.
That said, just vote No, if that is what you want. In the end,
everyone's work will be wasted, including yours.
Aleksandar Donev, Assistant Professor of Mathematics
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Office: 909 Warren Weaver Hall, New York University
E-mail: donev at courant.nyu.edu
Phone: (212) 992-7315; Fax: (212) 995-4121
Mailing address: 251 Mercer St, New York, NY 10012
More information about the J3