(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4387) WG5 informal ballot re Interop. TR
Mon Dec 6 23:19:54 EST 2010
John Reid wrote:
> I am very concerned that our schedule does not allow for more serious
> work to be done on the draft at the February J3 meeting. Furthermore,
> N1838 is not ready for PDTR ballot - for example, it contains 14
> Unresolved Technical Issues. I therefore propose that we delay the PDTR
> ballot until after the J3 meeting. I have checked with the SC22 Secretary
> that we are allowed for this to be a 2-month ballot, which would mean that
> the results would still be available for consideration at the June meeting
> of WG5. This is my proposed shedule:
> N1838 reviewed by WG5 2010-11
> Third draft 2011-02
> WG5 ballot 2011-02
> PDTR forwarded to SC22 2011-03
> PDTR ballot initiated 2011-03
> PDTR ballot comments available 2011-05
> DTR constructed 2011-06
> DTR ballot initiated 2011-07
> DTR ballot results available 2011-10
> TR published 2011-11
> I am starting a 4-week informal WG5 ballot on this schedule and on N1838.
> Please answer these questions by 9 a.m. UK time on 7 December.
> 1. Is the above revised schedule acceptable?
I do not believe that the revised schedule proposed above is achievable.
I do not think agreement on the technical issues by February 2011 is
representing Oracle America
More information about the J3