(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4367) WG5 informal ballot re Interop. TR
Mon Dec 6 04:52:47 EST 2010
David Muxworthy wrote:
> Revised vote:
>> 1. Is the above revised schedule acceptable?
> Yes but it is extremely optimistic. It depends (a) on all the UTIs
> being resolved at the February J3 meeting,
We have two months before the meeting to work on the UTIs, so this should not be
a problem. I am more concerned about major issues being raised at the last
minute, which is why I have asked for this ballot.
> (b) the revised document being distributed immediately afterwards, and
This is not a problem since we have the freedom to make it a 2-, 3-month ballot.
(c) WG5 then finding no faults in it.
This is not necessary, but of course huge changes are not acceptable.
>> 2. Do you have any comments on N1838?
May I remind everyone that the ballot has 24 hours to run? If you have
objections, please say now so that they can be addressed now rather than in
haste just before the meeting.
More information about the J3