(j3.2006) does move_alloc violate restrictions in 220.127.116.11?
Fri Oct 30 02:28:04 EDT 2009
Robert Corbett wrote:
> Van Snyder wrote:
>> Is this subroutine standard conforming?
>> subroutine Move_Alloc ( A, B )
>> real, intent(inout), allocatable :: A
>> real, intent(out), allocatable :: B
>> allocate ( b )
>> b = a
>> deallocate ( a )
>> end subroutine Move_Alloc
>> Now, how about if I call it
>> call move_alloc ( x, x )
>> The call is a problem, not the subroutine.
>> There's no problem with the standard's description of the intrinsic
>> subroutine Move_Alloc.
> I am beginning to think there is a problem with the standard's
> description of MOVE_ALLOC.
I just read Kurt Hirchert's e-mail, and I agree that item (1) on
page 300 does prohibit the call
CALL MOVE_ALLOC(X, X)
More information about the J3