(j3.2006) does move_alloc violate restrictions in 22.214.171.124?
Thu Oct 29 22:40:57 EDT 2009
> While I agree that intrinsics can be special, I would expect the
> standard to call out the cases where they are. As I explained in my
> previous response (copied below), I think MOVE_ALLOC is
> subject to the usual rules.
Thanks Bob for your reply. That is not what I have in mind unfortunately.
I'm a bit of tired on the discussions on this very topic, and have many
other issues to work with. But I'll not be surprised to see the same
question re-surface in a few years time when more implementations
available. Someone might ask the same question if the following code is
subroutine foo (a, b)
As of right now, I doubt it is. But let's put it aside as I don't feel
the email correspondence is really productive.
XL Fortran Compiler Test
IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, On, L6G 1C7
Phone (905) 413-3444 Tie-line 313-3444
email: jimxia at ca.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the J3