(j3.2006) Compilers disagree

[dick.hendrickson at att.net]

 I think it's paragraph 7 on the top of page 151 in specification expressions.

Dick Hendrickson
 -------------- Original message from Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov>: --------------


> My compilers disagree concerning whether this is legal:
> 
> subroutine before ( A, N )
>   implicit NONE
>   real A(N)
>   integer N
> end subroutine before
> 
> I thought the declaration for N had to precede its use in the
> declaration for A, but I can't find the relevant requirement.
> 
> Is it there, or am I imagining it?
> 
> -- 
> Van Snyder                    |  What fraction of Americans believe 
> Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov       |  Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
> Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
> disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20091027/0da7eb77/attachment.htm>