(j3.2006) J3/09-292 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #19 - due 19-Oct-2009

[Whitlock, Stan]

On Sep 17, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Whitlock, Stan wrote:
>
>
> The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
>
> Yes  No   Number     Title
>
> -Y-  ---  F95/0098   Are dummy functions returning assumed-length
>                             character legal?
> -Y-  ---  F03/0022   Coexistence of IEEE and non-IEEE kinds
> -Y-  ---  F03/0024   DEALLOCATE and array pointers
> -Y-  ---  F03/0034   IEEE_LOGB()
> -Y-  ---  F03/0039   HYPOT()
> -Y-  ---  F03/0078   IEEE_SUPPORT_DATATYPE vs. mathematical  
>                       equivalence
> -Y-  ---  F03/0090   Polymorphic array constructors
> -Y-  ---  F03/0130   Elemental specific intrinsic procedure
>                             characteristics
> -Y-  ---  F03/0131   SAVE attribute and EQUIVALENCE
> -Y-  ---  F03/0132   Unformatted i/o and private components
> -Y-  ---  F03/0133   Is unlimited polymorphic allowed in COMMON?
> -Y-  ---  F03/0134   Implicit typing of procedure pointers
> -Y-  ---  F03/0135   Interaction between RESULT, recursion, and host
>                             generic
> -Y-  ---  F03/0136   Are subroutines distinguishable from arrays?
> -Y-  ---  F03/0137   Dummy procedure type compatibility
> -Y-  ---  F03/0138   External <procedure-name> as <proc-target>
>
> The text of these interpretations is attached.  Each interpretation
> starts with a row of "-"s.
>
> Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
> column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
> answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send only the
> above text {not this entire mail message} with any comments to
>
>         j3 at j3-fortran.org
>
> by 11:59:59PM, PDT, Monday, 19-Oct-2009, in order to be counted.
>

/Stan