(j3.2006) J3/09-292 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #19 - due 19-Oct-2009

[Toon Moene]

Whitlock, Stan wrote:

> The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:

Stan, if you don't receive anything from Craig Rasmussen or Aleksander 
Donev, this is our vote:

Yes  No   Number     Title



-Y-  ---  F95/0098   Are dummy functions returning assumed-length
                      character legal?

-Y-  ---  F03/0022   Coexistence of IEEE and non-IEEE kinds

-Y-  ---  F03/0024   DEALLOCATE and array pointers

-Y-  ---  F03/0034   IEEE_LOGB()

-Y-  ---  F03/0039   HYPOT()

-Y-  ---  F03/0078   IEEE_SUPPORT_DATATYPE vs. mathematical equivalence

-C-  ---  F03/0090   Polymorphic array constructors

-Y-  ---  F03/0130   Elemental specific intrinsic procedure
                      characteristics

-Y-  ---  F03/0131   SAVE attribute and EQUIVALENCE

-Y-  ---  F03/0132   Unformatted i/o and private components

-Y-  ---  F03/0133   Is unlimited polymorphic allowed in COMMON?

-Y-  ---  F03/0134   Implicit typing of procedure pointers

-Y-  ---  F03/0135   Interaction between RESULT, recursion, and host
                      generic

-Y-  ---  F03/0136   Are subroutines distinguishable from arrays?

-Y-  ---  F03/0137   Dummy procedure type compatibility

-Y-  ---  F03/0138   External <procedure-name> as <proc-target>

F03/0090

The assignment to f should be to f1 in (1).

In (2) no return value is defined for function f2.

Kind regards,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html