(j3.2006) J3/09-292 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #19 - due 19-Oct-2009
Wed Oct 14 12:42:21 EDT 2009
Whitlock, Stan wrote:
> The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
Stan, if you don't receive anything from Craig Rasmussen or Aleksander
Donev, this is our vote:
Yes No Number Title
-Y- --- F95/0098 Are dummy functions returning assumed-length
-Y- --- F03/0022 Coexistence of IEEE and non-IEEE kinds
-Y- --- F03/0024 DEALLOCATE and array pointers
-Y- --- F03/0034 IEEE_LOGB()
-Y- --- F03/0039 HYPOT()
-Y- --- F03/0078 IEEE_SUPPORT_DATATYPE vs. mathematical equivalence
-C- --- F03/0090 Polymorphic array constructors
-Y- --- F03/0130 Elemental specific intrinsic procedure
-Y- --- F03/0131 SAVE attribute and EQUIVALENCE
-Y- --- F03/0132 Unformatted i/o and private components
-Y- --- F03/0133 Is unlimited polymorphic allowed in COMMON?
-Y- --- F03/0134 Implicit typing of procedure pointers
-Y- --- F03/0135 Interaction between RESULT, recursion, and host
-Y- --- F03/0136 Are subroutines distinguishable from arrays?
-Y- --- F03/0137 Dummy procedure type compatibility
-Y- --- F03/0138 External <procedure-name> as <proc-target>
The assignment to f should be to f1 in (1).
In (2) no return value is defined for function f2.
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
More information about the J3