(j3.2006) J3/09-292 - J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #19 - due 19-Oct-2009

[John Reid]

Robert Corbett wrote:
> The function presented in item (1) of interp F03/0090 may be part
> of a standard-conforming program only if it is never referenced
> because there is no assignment to the function result variable.
> Clearly, there is a typo in the example.  What is the preferred
> method for dealing with an issue such as this?  Should I vote to
> approve with a comment, or should I vote to diapprove?

Yes, if you look back to  07-231, the function name is f. Similarly, the second 
function name should be f. Or each occurrence of f should be changed to f1 in 
(1) and f2 in (2).

I suggest that you vote yes with a comment, since the change does not affect the 
meat of the question or the edits.

Cheers,

John.