(j3.2006) Question about generic names, procedure names, and constructors
Mon Nov 23 19:25:03 EST 2009
Van Snyder wrote:
> 16.3.1p3 says that a generic name may be the same as a procedure name
> "as explained in 22.214.171.124."
Bill Long replied:
> I think the relevant text is in 126.96.36.199, [283:9-11], which covers the case of
> a generic name and a procedure name being the same. The next paragraph,
> [283:12-13] covers the case of a generic name being the same as a derived-type
> The cross reference at [442:19] appears to need fixing.
I agree. This used to be described in 188.8.131.52 until we broke it up into
It would be useful if this were included in some country comment on the FCD
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.
More information about the J3