(j3.2006) Question about generic names, procedure names, and constructors

Malcolm Cohen malcolm
Mon Nov 23 19:25:03 EST 2009

Van Snyder wrote:
> 16.3.1p3 says that a generic name may be the same as a procedure name
> "as explained in"

Bill Long replied:
> I think the relevant text is in, [283:9-11], which covers the case of 
> a generic name and a procedure name being the same. The next paragraph, 
> [283:12-13] covers the case of a generic name being the same as a derived-type 
> name.
> The cross reference at [442:19] appears to need fixing.

I agree.  This used to be described in until we broke it up into 
several pieces.

It would be useful if this were included in some country comment on the FCD 

................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.

More information about the J3 mailing list