(j3.2006) Question about generic names, procedure names, and constructors
Sat Nov 21 12:30:57 EST 2009
Van Snyder wrote:
> 16.3.1p3 says that a generic name may be the same as a procedure name
> "as explained in 184.108.40.206."
I think the relevant text is in 220.127.116.11, [283:9-11], which covers the
case of a generic name and a procedure name being the same. The next
paragraph, [283:12-13] covers the case of a generic name being the same
as a derived-type name.
The cross reference at [442:19] appears to need fixing.
> I couldn't find anything in 18.104.22.168 that is germane to this statement.
> What does it mean? Where is it described in 22.214.171.124?
> Do 126.96.36.199 and 188.8.131.52 work for the case of a generic function name
> that is the same as a derived type name?
Yes, because of C496 at [80:22-24]. See also Note 4.58 on the same page.
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101
More information about the J3