(j3.2006) Question about generic names, procedure names, and constructors
Fri Nov 20 21:17:55 EST 2009
16.3.1p3 says that a generic name may be the same as a procedure name
"as explained in 184.108.40.206."
I couldn't find anything in 220.127.116.11 that is germane to this statement.
What does it mean? Where is it described in 18.104.22.168?
Do 22.214.171.124 and 126.96.36.199 work for the case of a generic function name
that is the same as a derived type name?
Van Snyder | What fraction of Americans believe
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov | Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.
More information about the J3