(j3.2006) Question about generic names, procedure names, and constructors

[Van Snyder]

16.3.1p3 says that a generic name may be the same as a procedure name
"as explained in 12.4.3.2."

I couldn't find anything in 12.4.3.2 that is germane to this statement.

What does it mean?  Where is it described in 12.4.3.2?

Do 12.5.5.1 and 12.5.5.2 work for the case of a generic function name
that is the same as a derived type name?

-- 
Van Snyder                    |  What fraction of Americans believe 
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov       |  Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.