(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4013) [ukfortran] Paper 09-238

David Muxworthy d.muxworthy
Sat Jun 13 11:45:21 EDT 2009


On 12 Jun 2009, at 18:00, Aleksandar Donev wrote:

> I vote yes! I have no idea what the distinction between J3 and WG5  
> list
> is.

The structure is (best seen if using equal spaced characters):

                            sc22wg5
                               |
                               |
               _______________________________________
              |          |             |              |
              |          |             |              |
             J3 list   UK list   Japanese list    individuals
                                                  in the rest
                                                  of the world

The UK list is well-used for UK-only discussions.  Having a single
list would mean people in Australia, India, Russia, etc getting
information on J3 hotel reservations that they probably don't need,
quite apart from increasing list maintenance work.

> It used to be that WG5 was used for the rare WG5 business before
> WG5 meetings.  Now it is used for technical discussions.

Not really.  Indexes of all messages since the system started in 1991
are on the web, see http://www.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/2009index.html
There has been quite a bit of technical discussion when it concerns
people outside J3.

> Sorry, it is hard to change "TO" fields on hundreds of messages  
> from Nick.

Come on.  The system has been running pretty satisfactorily for 18  
years.
It is a commonplace that people hit 'send' before they have put their  
brain
in gear but are you really saying it is beyond the wit, or patience, of
the current set of Fortran standards people to look at the original  
'To:'
or 'cc:' field on a message and change the corresponding field on the  
reply
accordingly?
Cheers,
David





More information about the J3 mailing list