(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4004) Paper 09-238

[Aleksandar Donev]

Repeat on WG5, sorry for rushing the first time:

On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:19, N.M. Maclaren wrote:

> Comments appreciated, especially ones that point out where I have
> completely misunderstood the intent of the standard!
First I have to understand your intention. Can you please explain this
and how it is not covered by "Its value shall be...the C address of an
interoperable data entity"?

"C_F_POINTER is ambiguous about whether a C
pointer with an interoperable
type that has a valid value (either null or not) that does not point to
an object is acceptable."

Aleks