(j3.2006) a question on cobounds

Loren P Meissner lpmeissner
Tue Jul 28 12:45:46 EDT 2009


Can somebody come up with a better term than SYMMETRIC for this concept?
(Unless the term is already imbedded in the standard.) Do you mean something
like "the array size is invariant across images"? 

=

I always thought a "symmetric array" is supposed to be one where A(I, J) and
A(J, I) have the same VALUE for all I and J. This terminology is obviously
not intended here, so it needs to at least be explained away if people
continue to use it.

=

LOREN

 

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at j3-fortran.org] On Behalf
Of Bill Long
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:23 AM
To: fortran standards email list for J3
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) a question on cobounds

 

[...]

 

2) Having the cobounds the same on all images enhances the concept that THE
ARRAYS ARE SYMMETRIC ACROSS IMAGES.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20090728/5187a320/attachment.html 



More information about the J3 mailing list