(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3855) [ukfortran] WG5 vote 6 on interpretations

jane at davies-sleightholme.co.uk jane
Sun Jan 18 10:46:16 EST 2009

The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes   No   Number     Title
-Y-   ---  F95/0074   TARGET dummy arguments and POINTER expressions
-Y-   ---  F95/0102   mask-expr evaluated only once
-Y-   ---  F03/0049   Separators in list-directed output involving UDDTIO
-Y-   ---  F03/0073   C interop of dummy procedures
-Y-   ---  F03/0074   Type mismatch for C character arguments
-Y-   ---  F03/0075   C interop of derived types with array components
-Y-   ---  F03/0076   Scope of Fortran names of procedures with binding
-Y-   ---  F03/0077   LBOUND of array structure component
-Y-   ---  F03/0081   F edit descriptor with field width 0
-Y-   ---  F03/0082   VALUE in place of INTENT for pure procedure dummy
-Y-   ---  F03/0087   Entry names as dummy procedure arguments
-Y-   ---  F03/0098   Does allocate with source= define subcomponents?
-Y-   ---  F03/0099   Clause 16 does not account for volatile variable
-Y-   ---  F03/0102   Evaluation of bound-expr in data pointer assignment
-Y-   ---  F03/0109   Referencing deferred binding via absent dummy argument
-Y-   ---  F03/0111   Is defined assignment to a vector subscripted
                       array allowed?
-Y-   ---  F03/0113   Size and uniqueness considerations for ID=
-Y-   ---  F03/0114   Inconsistent restrictions on i/o specifiers
-Y-   ---  F03/0117   STOP executed via function in input/output list

The text of these interpretations is in N1764 (or 08-006Ar4).  Each
interpretation starts with a row of "-"s.

Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send to

         sc22wg5 at open-std.org


Jane Sleightholme


visit our website for details of Fortran training courses and  
consultancy services.

More information about the J3 mailing list