(j3.2006) [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: Coindexed scalars, etc.
Sun Jan 18 08:00:52 EST 2009
Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> I think the  should always go at the end, after all the local
> selectors, including substrings, so I vote for c(i)(l:r)[p]. For %Re and
> %Im I agree that they should be treated as components.
No. We don't have arrays of single characters, we have arrays of type character.
Selecting a substring is like selecting a component of a structure. Anyway,
I see this as a change not allowed by Resolution T7 of the Tokyo 2008
meeting: "... the technical content should not be changed unless a
serious flaw is found."
> Van Snyder wrote:
>> Malcolm's message yesterday didn't edit the productions for substrings.
>> The suggestion here replaces <object-name> in R601 instead of adding
I prefer Malcolm's since it retains <object-name> as the first possibility for
<designator>. This is a very important case.
>> I believe the following covers coindexed scalars, coindexed complex
>> parts, coindexed type parameter inquiries, and coindexed substrings.
>> Adding coindexed whole arrays is trivial (just remove the proposed
>> constraint C600a).
Would this not also break Resolution T7? What is the "serious flaw"?
More information about the J3