(j3.2006) J3/09-307 J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #20 - due 18-Dec-2009

[Jim Xia]

Vote from Jim



The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No   Number     Title

-C-  ---  F03/0139   Functions returning procedure pointers
-Y-  ---  F03/0140   Type of nested construct entities
-Y-  ---  F03/0141   More than one specific interface for a procedure


Comments on F03/0139

In answer (1b), it says [430:13] "data object"->"data entity".  Shouldn't
this be changed to [430:13] "data object"->"entity"?




Happy holidays.


Jim Xia

XL Fortran Compiler Test
IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, On, L6G 1C7
Phone (905) 413-3444  Tie-line 313-3444
email: jimxia at ca.ibm.com
D2/YF7/8200 /MKM

http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/fortran/xlfortran



From:
"Whitlock, Stan" <stan.whitlock at intel.com>
To:
x3j3 <j3 at j3-fortran.org>
Cc:
"Whitlock, Stan" <stan.whitlock at intel.com>
Date:
11/13/2009 02:15 AM
Subject:
(j3.2006) J3/09-307 J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #20 - due 18-Dec-2009



                                                           09-307
 
To:        J3 Members
From:      Stan Whitlock
Subject:   J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #20 - due 18-Dec-2009
Date: 2009 November 13
 
 
Enclosed in the next letter ballot on Fortran interpretations.
 
The rules by which we operate say:
 
    o   J3 votes on the answer at a J3 meeting; a simple majority
        vote marks the answer as "passed by J3 meeting".
 
    o   Between J3 meetings the chair of /interp sends a J3 letter
        ballot to J3 to approve interp answers that have been "passed
        by J3 meeting".  The letter ballot runs for 30 days.  Not
        voting on three of four consecutive J3 letter ballots is
        grounds to terminate J3 membership.  An interp answer passes
        by a 2/3rds vote;  a no vote must be accompanied by an
        explanation of the changes necessary to change the member's
        vote to yes.
 
        J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for
        more study even if the answer passes.
 
3 Fortran interpretations are currently "Passed by J3 meeting" after
J3 meeting #190.  This is the letter ballot phase to go from "Passed
by J3 meeting" to "Passed by J3 letter ballot".
 
The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
 
Yes  No   Number     Title
 
---  ---  F03/0139   Functions returning procedure pointers
---  ---  F03/0140   Type of nested construct entities
---  ---  F03/0141   More than one specific interface for a procedure
 
The text of these interpretations is attached.  Each interpretation
starts with a row of "-"s.
 
Please mark the above -Y- in the Yes column for "yes", -C- in the Yes
column for "yes with comment", or -N- in the No column for a "no"
answer {be sure to include your reasons with "no"} and send only the
above text {not this entire mail message} with any comments to
 
        j3 at j3-fortran.org
 
by 11:59:59PM, PDT, Friday, 18-Dec-2009, in order to be counted.
 
 
Thanks                         /Stan[attachment "09-307 LB #20 due 
18-Dec-2009.txt" deleted by Jim Xia/Toronto/IBM] 
_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at j3-fortran.org
http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20091216/98ec0bf3/attachment-0001.htm>