(j3.2006) COMPILER_OPTIONS and COMPILER_VERSION
Tue Sep 23 17:02:47 EDT 2008
Van Snyder wrote:
> I don't understand why we prohibit a generic interface to have the same
> name as one of its specific procedures. The processor can clearly
> figure out which is which in the case of intrinsic procedures. Would
> there be an insurmountable problem for program-defined generics? I
> don't see why: In procedure references, it's the generic name; in
> pointer assignment or argument association, it's the specific name.
You can have the generic name the same as one of the specific names.
220.127.116.11.1 para 3 (page 279) of the CD.
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc., 1340 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights, MN, 55120
More information about the J3