(j3.2006) kind conversion for intent(in), value dummy arguments

Aleksandar Donev donev1
Mon Sep 15 18:55:59 EDT 2008

On Monday 15 September 2008 15:51, Craig Rasmussen wrote:
> can an actual argument of a different kind always be associated with the
> dummy declared above?
No. VALUE dummies are not excepted from the rest of the rules, which demand 
type matching. There is no implicit type conversion ala C even for BIND(C) 

More information about the J3 mailing list