(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3662) [ukfortran] N1755: Request for new features from MPI Forum
Tue Nov 11 18:51:04 EST 2008
Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> Anyway, I found only two cases of relevance where VOLATILE and ASYNCHRONOUS
> were not both included:
> 1. "C557 An entity with the VALUE attribute shall not have the ... VOLATILE
> Van wrote a paper that this is stupid and should be deleted. I cannot remember
> if it passed. I supported it.
I don't see an edit like this in 08-020r1.
> 2. "C559 An entity with the VOLATILE attribute shall be a variable that is not
> an INTENT (IN) dummy argument."
> Please explain this one to me.
INTENT(IN) implies that the dummy argument does not change its value
(for the non-pointer case) inside the subprogram. It allows the
compiler to snap a copy of the variable in a register and keep it there
throughout execution of the subprogram, for example. Pretty much
completely incompatible with the implications of volatile.
> Are there other examples?
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc., 1340 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights, MN, 55120
More information about the J3