(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3548) N1718: co_lbound and co_ubound

Toon Moene toon
Fri Mar 7 01:11:39 EST 2008


John Reid wrote:

[ co_lbound and co_ubound missing ]

> I think our reason for having a ballot is to catch mistakes like this 
> and that the correction should be made.

Other than these, I see nothing to object to in the document.

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon at moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.indiv.nluug.nl/~toon/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-01/msg00009.html



More information about the J3 mailing list